Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 May 1999 16:42:18 +1000 (EST)
From:      Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
To:        wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters)
Cc:        imp@harmony.village.org, ilmar@ints.ru, posix1e@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: secure deletion
Message-ID:  <199905200642.QAA11368@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <37438E4C.4B95B937@softweyr.com> from Wes Peters at "May 19, 99 10:23:40 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some email I received from Wes Peters, sie wrote:
> Warner Losh wrote:
> > 
> > In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905191535110.7728-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru> "Ilmar S. Habibulin" writes:
> > : May be it's an freebsd-fs@ question, but i think that it belings here to.
> > : I heard that some linux fs (maybe extfs2?) have some secure deletion flag,
> > : which being set on inode(file or dir) cause content of this file to be
> > : wiped before deletion, so even if somebody manage to restore file, its
> > : content would be unusable. I think, that it is nice feature, and i would
> > : like to see it in freebsd. What would you say?
> > :
> > : PS. I have implementation of this feature for freebsd-2.2.5. May be i can
> > : port it to 3.x.
> > 
> > Does it doe the DoD recommended patter of deletion?  That is overwrite
> > the blocks with sever different series of bit patterns to make it
> > impossible to recover using the usual techniques, or is it just a
> > bzero of the blocks in question?  The former is secure deletion, the
> > latter is too insecure for most people that want this feature...
> 
> The standard used to be 100 overwrites of 0xe5 then 0x5e, but they 
> changed the standard just as I was leaving the defense industry in
> 1991.  Does Posix or SUS have anything to say about this?

I'd worry about this sort of thing when and if FreeBSD is ever used for
storing of (officially) classified/confidential material and even then,
the solution is likely to be to take a hammer or drill to the disks.

For normal users, who are very unlikely to have any worries about someone
doing an in-depth magnetic scan of their disk, a singal overwrite will be
just as effect as 100.

Lets try being a little realistic, eh ?

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905200642.QAA11368>