From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 18:41:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB4A106566B for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp5.server.rpi.edu (smtp5.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458C58FC14 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.124.153] (crustacean-24.dynamic.rpi.edu [128.113.124.153]) by smtp5.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m53HS2Xg020149; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:28:03 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20080603164503.GC1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> References: <20080603164503.GC1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:28:01 -0400 To: Ulrich Spoerlein , current@FreeBSD.org From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.225 Cc: Subject: Re: Subversion documentation for the FreeBSD project? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:41:07 -0000 At 6:45 PM +0200 6/3/08, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >Hi all, > >seems like I totally missed the effort to port the FreeBSD CVS to SVN. >Is there some documentation around, that describes the New Way for us >mere mortals? Specific questions that come to my mind: > >- How will repository propagation be done in the future? rsync? >- Is there one big svn tree or src/ ports/ doc/ seperately? >- Did you fixup the CVS repo-copies into real SVN renames? >- Will svn(1) ever be part of the base system? >- Some statistics about repo-size would be nice :) It is still a work in progress, and people who do not need commit access should (for now) not do anything special. All the CVS-based services should still be working, and it is probably best to continue to use those for now. It is still possible that we'll hit some unexpected cases in subversion, and find that we have to switch right back to CVS. Not that I expect to switch back to CVS, but the change to subversion was *JUST* done, and there's still a few rough edges which are not finished yet. Give the people working on this a few more weeks to sort out the details and make sure everything is working OK. There is some sketchy documentation of what has happened, it is not good enough to be much help to end-users. I will make the guess that more useful information to be available by the end of June. Please realize that a LOT of work was involved in making this switch (none of which was done by me... ahem). So we don't mean to dismiss your request or your interest, but we're just not ready with all the answers that you would like to see. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA