Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:53:44 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r314859 - head/palm/jpilot Message-ID: <20130322145344.GA16844@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <514C6DEF.10201@passap.ru> References: <201303211827.r2LIRHrh078301@svn.freebsd.org> <514C6DEF.10201@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:42:55PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 21.03.2013 22:27, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: > > --- head/palm/jpilot/Makefile Thu Mar 21 18:25:04 2013 (r314858) > > +++ head/palm/jpilot/Makefile Thu Mar 21 18:27:17 2013 (r314859) > [...] > > -# "?=" and "+=" are for including this Makefile from japanese/jpilot > > Not particular to this commit, but rather a general question: > what is our current policy on comments at the makefile headers? > I mean non-standard comments (maintainer tips, etc.). Should > they be deleted? I would not delete them (in general case). In this particular case I assume they were deleted because they were stating quite obvious thing: certain variables with +=/?= are clear indication of master/slave relationship. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130322145344.GA16844>