From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 22:45:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18AF16A412 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4008143CC3 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Message-ID: <4579EB08.8080704@intersonic.se> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:45:28 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Am I an Idiot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:45:32 -0000 Hi all, We're running around 25 FBSD servers, mostly 6 and a few 5-STABLE. For a few months, we also run our internal storage/smb/whatnot machine on -current. Never had ANY issues. Just works, and better than 6-*. Now, we are about to replace our MX's and I'm thinking of deploying -current on them instead of upcoming 6.2. Right now running tests on the hardware, two ProLiant DL360G3 cpu's and everything looks just fine. Am I an idiot or is anyone else out there running -current on production systems? I figured if one MX goes haywire at least we've got another one... Very interested in your opinion. Thanks /per