From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 2 21:28:31 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA17431 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 21:28:31 -0800 Received: from po4.andrew.cmu.edu (PO4.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.104]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA17423 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 21:28:29 -0800 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po4.andrew.cmu.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) id AAA12059; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:28:19 -0500 Received: via switchmail; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:28:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from unix20.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:27:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from unix20.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:27:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from Messages.8.5.N.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.unix20.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.unix20.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:27:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:27:58 -0500 (EST) From: Robert N Watson To: freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd 2.0.5 installation with Windows 95 CC: terry@lambert.org, a.mondini@agora.stm.it, questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199511030307.NAA11005@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199511030307.NAA11005@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Excerpts from internet.computing.freebsd-questions: 3-Nov-95 Re: FreeBsd 2.0.5 installat.. Michael Smith@atrad.adel (1072*) > FAT is FAT. They mount fine, modulo the problems with the MSDOSFS as it > stands. BTW -- has anyone done any comparisons between the Linux MSDOSFS code and the FreeBSD one to look for obvious differences that might result in the corruption problems with the FreeBSD version? ---- Robert Watson (rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu) * Double major: IDS/CS * H&SS http://www.watson.org/ robert@fledge.watson.org