Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 10:10:14 -0600 (CST) From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SO_KEEPALIVE Message-ID: <199604021610.KAA26215@brasil.moneng.mei.com> In-Reply-To: <1600.828426854@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Apr 2, 96 06:34:14 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Question, stupid, nonetheless a question: > > > > Does anybody see any advantage to allowing for a way to set a systemwide > > SO_KEEPALIVE default of ON? > > make a sysctl variable for this. It's really easy. Yeah, well, that's nice :-) I wanted to know if there would be any general interest. I'm not a kernel hacker so it would take a bit of expenditure of effort on my part to figure all that out, yadda yadda yadda, and if it was something that would not make it into -current, I would opt for a quick and dirty hack. Can anyone suggest an appropriate name for such a variable? ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/546-7968
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604021610.KAA26215>