Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 16:58:07 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ali Polatel <alip@exherbo.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability to tell the difference between normal and syscall traps Message-ID: <20100509135807.GH83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100509053303.GD8186@harikalardiyari> References: <20100508111509.GB8186@harikalardiyari> <20100508123626.GC83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100509053303.GD8186@harikalardiyari>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:33:03AM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote: > Kostik Belousov yazm??: > > On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 02:15:09PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote: > > > Does FreeBSD's ptrace have a way to tell the difference between normal > > > traps and those caused by a system call? > > >=20 > > > On Linux? this is possible by passing PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD option to= the > > > ptrace request PTRACE_SETOPTIONS which makes the kernel set bit 7 in = the > > > syscall number when delivering system call traps, > > > (i.e., deliver (SIGTRAP | 0x80)). > > >=20 > > > I'm not sure if this is possible on FreeBSD. PT_LWPINFO request looks > > > related but can't be sure. > > >=20 > > > ?: http://linux.die.net/man/2/ptrace > >=20 > > There is already procfs(5)-based interface to get a reason for stop. > > Look at the ioctl PIOCSTATUS. Yes, you have to mount procfs. > >=20 > > The interface can be lifted to ptrace(2), but I think using the capacity > > of procfs is not wrong there. >=20 > Hmm ok, I've been playing around with PIOCSTATUS but it doesn't seem to > work, there's not much documentation about it either so I figured I'll > just ask. >=20 > The code is here: http://alip.github.com/code/piocstatus.c >=20 > The traced child is stopped at the beginning of a system call. I await > that the PIOCSTATUS request sets ps.why to S_SCE but it's always zero. > Can you help me figure out what I'm doing wrong? :) Apparently I missed the fact that S_PT_SCE and S_SCE are different flags. It seems you have to use procfs stop events (PIOCBIS) and procfs-based loop to get p_step set to 1. --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvmv28ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jm8ACcCJiV+AcVpGvAvO/hyO+QEF/T 2rcAoMrQrd16cH5qRiENMQOhI5AwgYmG =iX9b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100509135807.GH83316>