Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:35:43 -0500 From: Travis Mikalson <bofh@terranova.net> To: Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@undp.org> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Revision E Message-ID: <3648958F.9C5C03CE@terranova.net> References: <36487EE6.81B29D0D@terranova.net> <364885C5.A809D885@undp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ugen Antsilevitch wrote: > > Heh...i asked this question in here this morning actually:) I think this is > probably what i have - > it's dell and it has AHA-2940UW. I tried to use with with 2.2.7-stable and > it didn't work:) > Let's see if you get any better answers:) > --Ugen Oh as far as I know they work just fine until you put load on them.. then they spew timeout errors. At least that's been my experience with the Rev. E chipset 2940s with either 2.2 or 3.0 as of about 6 months ago (pre-CAM) A dual channel AHA-2940 would be a 3940 which uses a different and unsupported chipset (the 7895 I believe) unless you either patch CAM into 2.2 or use 3.0 which now uses CAM. Although I wouldn't put 3.0 into immediate production without testing it out thoroughly it would be easier for you to install than trying to get a CAM-patched 2.2 working. -T -- TerraNovaNet Internet Services - Key Largo, FL Voice: (305)453-4011 Fax: (305)451-5991 http://www.terranova.net/ ---------------------------------------------- "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry'..." -- Gary Larson, "The Far Side" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3648958F.9C5C03CE>