From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 10:58:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D27B97 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1384218EA for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WYvdD-00015W-7k for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:57:55 +0200 Received: from tempe0.bbox.io ([24.249.180.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:57:55 +0200 Received: from kevin.bowling by tempe0.bbox.io with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:57:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Kevin Bowling Subject: Re: Multihomed system with jails routing issues Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 03:57:42 -0700 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <533F68EF.8060607@nevermind.co.nz> <53402D68.4030500@freebsd.org> <53411885.7030206@nevermind.co.nz> <53415866.1030107@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tempe0.bbox.io User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/28.0 In-Reply-To: <53415866.1030107@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:58:04 -0000 On 4/6/2014 6:36 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 4/6/14, 5:04 PM, Chris Smith wrote: >> On 06/04/14 04:20, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Hey Julian, >> >> Thanks for that. I did come across it but all of the documentation I >> found indicated that it was experimental. >> >> After a day or so messing around with VIMAGE/vnet and their various >> gotchas and interactions with jails on FreeBSD 10, I have something >> working that I'm happy with. > > as long as you steer clear of pf and do only 'vanilla' stuff, you should > be ok. > let us know what you think and I'd like to see your notes published, if > not officially then at least put here so that others can find it in the > archives. There have been long standing memory leaks in stopping VNET jails. For instance kern/164763. Is there anyone looking into this? Is there any will to enable VNET by default in -CURRENT? Regards, Kevin