From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 12 06:29:27 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA25806 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 06:29:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA25790 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 06:29:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.46]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA19494; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:30:27 +0500 Message-ID: <369B5BEE.4C520865@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:27:59 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Price CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why so many ghostscript ports? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I thought it was already closed because it didn't build on ELF...in fact it "motivated" the new port :). Steve Price wrote: > > Suits me just fine. Can we also close out PR ports/6312 > which is for version 3.33 and happens to have been submitted > by Pedro? :) > > -steve > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message