From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 23:17:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B012416A503 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46E443CBF for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB8NG055045941; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:16:02 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20061208171522.0246ee00@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:15:49 -0600 To: Per olof Ljungmark , freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <4579EB08.8080704@intersonic.se> References: <4579EB08.8080704@intersonic.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Am I an Idiot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:17:32 -0000 Best practices are to run only stable on production servers. -Derek At 04:45 PM 12/8/2006, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >Hi all, > >We're running around 25 FBSD servers, mostly 6 and a few 5-STABLE. For a >few months, we also run our internal storage/smb/whatnot machine on >-current. Never had ANY issues. Just works, and better than 6-*. > >Now, we are about to replace our MX's and I'm thinking of deploying >-current on them instead of upcoming 6.2. Right now running tests on the >hardware, two ProLiant DL360G3 cpu's and everything looks just fine. > >Am I an idiot or is anyone else out there running -current on production >systems? I figured if one MX goes haywire at least we've got another >one... Very interested in your opinion. > >Thanks /per >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.