From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 14:19:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82616A407 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2A13C46E for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.centtech.com (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l42EJPao079726; Wed, 2 May 2007 09:19:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <46389DED.5060509@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 09:19:25 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <200705021453.20372.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3195/Wed May 2 04:34:51 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal + gmirror question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:19:40 -0000 On 05/02/07 08:31, Ivan Voras wrote: > Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> Do I have to write the gjournal label to mirror/HOME or to the single >> providers? > > to mirror/HOME. Since you probably already have a file system there, > you'll maybe wish to separate the journal to another partition. > >> If I want to include it in fstab, is it true that I have to disable the auto >> fsck? So the line reads something like this: >> /dev/mirror/HOME.journal /home ufs rw,async 1 0 (<- disables fsck, right?) > > Don't see why you'd HAVE to disable it. Maybe you'll want to because it > could take a long time. > Why would it take a long time? Eric