From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 13 10:08:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E755F4;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41CED1B18;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq4so1941887wib.2
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:08:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=tHadce/cvRs4FG7LAPHLRup2HliuGKsxmP1KL4YX7E8=;
 b=0xEQIBic/fERbSNZYirP+1s3BfDGLSvnGKkg8dST1boiCgCjBuF9PCukfkdhVPAKwa
 +kjjuFu205MeIiMuoloM9P9JMjb2ICkcgjqmAJcZctY/qUxpPLcBO8YyRjDz+BlRcBh6
 qONiW3IaLwxZXhdV5Hf+IqzBbT9VLyYSzbEaXHSJux1giFTou5Ve2J0MNg1YitOVmok7
 RyFJGJN5Aq/MF/BLG0ggDyZAV/MH+bqW3MEp/VHA8ZoaKw+DZdMZIe3QzzCvwHEQLXhp
 8WhXPZNMZO3Nk6kpEhizvt/6uHnv8Kj6slUB+aM7RMXoZHPpP+SFJPNGTTXRDW50AJl4
 jeIg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.76.42 with SMTP id h10mr14505799wiw.46.1389607726549;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:08:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.81.8 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:08:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52CF82C0.9040708@delphij.net>
References: <B0F3AA0A-2D23-424B-8A79-817CD2EBB277@FreeBSD.org>
 <52CEAD69.6090000@grosbein.net>
 <81785015-5083-451C-AC0B-4333CE766618@FreeBSD.org>
 <52CF82C0.9040708@delphij.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:08:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAO82ECEsS-rKq7A-9w7VuxKpe_c_f=tvZQoRKgHEfi-yPdNeGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NTP security hole CVE-2013-5211?
From: Cristiano Deana <cristiano.deana@gmail.com>
To: Xin LI <d@delphij.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:08:49 -0000

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:

Hi,

We will have an advisory next week.  If a NTP server is properly
> configured, it's likely that they are not affected
>

I had this problem in november, and ask to -current to integrate the new
versione of ntpd in base (see my mail "[request] ntp upgrade" 11/27/13
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-November/046822.html
).
I tried several workaround with config and policy, and ended up you MUST
have 4.2.7 to stop these kind of attacks.

I think it's better to upgrade the version in base AND to write a security
advisory.

Thank you

-- 
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/