From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 21 00:27:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D8537B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0343F85
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:27:56 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from bc979@lafn.org)
Received: from lafn.org (host-66-81-16-112.rev.o1.com [66.81.16.112])
	by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5L7Qsrm071857;
	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bc979@lafn.org)
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:26:42 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030621015051.GA62479@rot13.obsecurity.org>
Message-Id: <B4839362-A3B9-11D7-BA30-000393681B06@lafn.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 5.1 for production systems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:27:59 -0000


On Friday, Jun 20, 2003, at 18:50 US/Pacific, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 05:48:20PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> Some time ago there was an announcement that people should not use 5.0
>> for critical production systems.  Now that 5.1 is available, what is
>> the consesous on it?  Should it be used for critical production 
>> systems
>> yet?
>
> If you're worried and don't need any of the new features, wait until
> 5.x-STABLE.

Thanks to all.  I think I will wait.  It would be nice to have the 
ability to burn DVDs but that is not very essential.