From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 27 15:11:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B0D14D35 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 15:11:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA07565; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 18:11:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 18:11:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199904272211.SAA07565@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Our routed - Vern says it's old and buggy. In-Reply-To: <47565.925249808@verdi.nethelp.no> References: <47565.925249808@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG <> Finally learned enough about routing to understand this. Which router >> program does OSPF? Gated? > Yes. >> Since OSPF seems to have a lot of good features, and it's hardly new, >> why isn't a router using OSPF installed with FreeBSD? > Probably because: [three good reasons deleted] Most importantly: - Recent values of GateD are distributed under a very unfriendly license. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message