Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 10:30:31 -0500 From: Diane Bruce <db@db.net> To: Jason Birch <jbirch@jbirch.net> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Port: U-Boot for BeagleBone Message-ID: <20130518153031.GA64682@night.db.net> In-Reply-To: <CAA=KUhspUwuNPW13bgZVy9CKwn6Ny_Njt0AXBH27XZPEuKgaWg@mail.gmail.com> References: <3B16A2E5-C92B-4248-BE98-DD5C1194CB05@freebsd.org> <20130518100512.57c47fe6@bender> <B5DE3D0D-86BF-43F8-9FA2-A803B1FAABF8@freebsd.org> <D3F7C462-0BD5-4F20-AE32-448BB7B5855D@bsdimp.com> <CAA=KUhspUwuNPW13bgZVy9CKwn6Ny_Njt0AXBH27XZPEuKgaWg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:39AM +1000, Jason Birch wrote: > I'm not sure how it'd work internally in the ports tree (I'm a ports > consumer, not a contributor), but I'd find it weird if a U-Boot port > required me to get any devel/cross-* ports if U-Boot was able to be built > by Clang native to FreeBSD 9.X+ and I had Clang set as my CC, CPP, CXX. If src flip the bit to always build xcross in HEAD it's trivial to add an OSVERSION test to use native rather than use a xcross port. I am on freebsd-arm now. - Diane -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130518153031.GA64682>