From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 14:45:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576D1A6F; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1160B8FC08; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYeDa-0006ob-RA; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:30 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYeDZ-0003ro-Qa; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:30 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAEEjTfl047897; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:29 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qAEEjTXQ047896; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:29 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:29 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: toolchain@freebsd.org, zeising@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] devel/binutils 2.23 In-Reply-To: <5097D37B.1020806@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:32 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:55:55 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising Hi! Attached is a patch that updates the devel/binutils port to the latest version, 2.23. This is a minor version, and looking at the release notes I can't see anything suprising. Nonetheless it would be very good to have it tested before I commit the update (sometime after 9.1 when the ports tree is unfrozen). I am especially interested in testing on things not i386 or amd64, since I only have access to those architectures. When applying the patch, remember to add -E to patch, to remove empty files. Thank you! -- Niclas Zeising It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current. I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are simple tests. Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files from under files/ after applying the patch: # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/ total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc # because I think all files in this directory will be used as patches, no matter the name. Am I wrong? Anton