Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:45:29 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: toolchain@freebsd.org, zeising@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] devel/binutils 2.23 Message-ID: <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <5097D37B.1020806@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:55:55 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Hi! Attached is a patch that updates the devel/binutils port to the latest version, 2.23. This is a minor version, and looking at the release notes I can't see anything suprising. Nonetheless it would be very good to have it tested before I commit the update (sometime after 9.1 when the ports tree is unfrozen). I am especially interested in testing on things not i386 or amd64, since I only have access to those architectures. When applying the patch, remember to add -E to patch, to remove empty files. Thank you! -- Niclas Zeising It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current. I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are simple tests. Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files from under files/ after applying the patch: # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/ total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc # because I think all files in this directory will be used as patches, no matter the name. Am I wrong? Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896>