From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 5 16:18:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EACCD5F673 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 16:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdports@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ares.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612691F7 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 16:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdports@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ares.cloudzeeland.nl (unknown [10.10.10.32]) by ares.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AD14FE7E05; Fri, 5 May 2017 18:18:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.40] (styx.zeeland24.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ares.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B7514FE7E04; Fri, 5 May 2017 18:18:52 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: ICU Portupdate faulty To: mokhi References: <1c87d7b6-54f7-77f0-7476-338bd24aee54@cloudzeeland.nl> <8d3c7d80-d51e-3743-eb41-d6633c498153@cloudzeeland.nl> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Jos Chrispijn Message-ID: <805526d8-0fb0-3038-58b1-d398369b0734@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 18:18:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ares.cloudzeeland.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 16:18:56 -0000 Yes I noticed as well. Point is that after updating my tree, the issue still exists allthough I have th correct portupdate in my ports. Let me check what is going wrong here. Thanks, Jos Op 5-5-2017 om 17:48 schreef mokhi: > Well, as I can see here < http://www.freshports.org/devel/icu/ > an > older version of this port is vulnerable not current version. > Maybe by updating your tree your problem will be solved :-]