From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Oct 23 18:46:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA27697
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 18:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net ([198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA27683
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 18:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.2/8.6.9) id UAA00224; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 20:45:52 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199610240145.UAA00224@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: Possibility?
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 20:45:51 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199610232139.XAA28481@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 23, 96 11:39:28 pm
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>
> J"org said:
> 
> This is not a problem of the core team, it's merely a problem of that
> none of the existing _committers_ seems to fully understand your
> patches.  You're confusing things: it requires a committer to
> integrate something, there are currently 66 of them available.  It
> doesn't necessarily require a core team member for doing this (though
> incidentally ;), all the core team member also happen to be
> committers).
> 
Actually, it is more that the changes are significant enough that
any single committer isn't willing/able to make the changes without
consensus...

John