From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 14 3:24:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B5637B401 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6F143ED1 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:24:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (dslpool2-019.networldnoc.net [209.63.227.179]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB857438F8; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:08:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3DFB11AA.9D94BD6B@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:10:34 -0800 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Pole Cc: Michael Nottebrock , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cyrix CPUs, was: Re: Repeatable crash from nautilus2 References: <20021213021012.61714.qmail@web40303.mail.yahoo.com> <004901c2a25c$0c381c50$0301a8c0@prime> <1039756076.12023.5.camel@localhost> <3DF974C6.3070901@gmx.net> <1039764208.12365.12.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG James Pole wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 18:48, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > James Pole wrote: > > > I think the fact Cyrix isn't very popular these days > > > > Ain't the VIA C3-CPUs everyone wants likes so much CYRIX-Technology, too? > > They have less than one percent of the market. I have, personally, never > seen a Cyrix/VIA-powered computer over the past few years. I saw lots of them up until February of this year, when I was no longer making itty bitty routers. They're quite common in small embedded boxes meant for broadband routers, etc. OpenBSD seems to run fine on them. ;^) > Looking at > benchmark scores, Cyrix is always near the bottom. Even a Celeron at > could probably beat a C3 processor at twice the clock speed.... Maybe so, but when you want a 1" x 4" x 6" box with 2x 100Base-TX and no fan, they seem to work pretty well. > Everyone I know uses either Intel or AMD processors. Intel/AMD combined > probably have around 90~95% of the market, with Cyrix, Transmeta, > PowerPC, SPARC and other RISC processors battling for the rest. Perhaps in your desktop world. All Pentium-class cpus combined equals about 1% of the 32 bit processor market by unit count. Don't take my word for it, read the year-end roundup in the Microprocessor Report. It's probably dropping now, but for several years the NEC Vr4300 was outselling all Pentium chips combined about 40 to 1. > I've seem more Apples than Cyrixs, and that says a lot... Perhaps you haven't been looking in the right places? Check under the hood of your cable modem... -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message