Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 00:18:02 -0500 From: Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r350 drm Message-ID: <4279AC8A.7060208@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <1115269161.23405.19.camel@leguin> References: <4279A5A0.2060806@alumni.rice.edu> <1115269161.23405.19.camel@leguin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 05/04/05 23:59, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:48 -0500, Jonathan Noack wrote: >>I decided to play around with all the new DRM/DRI/XORG/ETC stuff. I >>looked over at the r300.sourceforge.net site for some info, added my >>All-In-Wonder 9800 Pro to the PCI IDs (see attached drm.diff), and then >>kldloaded radeon. Looks like it worked successfully: >> >>kernel: drm0: <ATI Radeon NH R350 9800 Pro> port 0x7800-0x78ff mem >>0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xefcf0000-0xefcfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 >>kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 128MB >>kernel: info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.16.0 20050311 on minor 0 >>kernel: info: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode >> >>With the xorg-server-snapshot and dri-devel I seem to have even enabled >>direct rendering (see Xorg log output in attached drm.txt), although >>render acceleration is disabled. > > You did install both the DRM and DRI driver from r300.sf.net CVS, right? > I was wrong about our kernel DRM really supporting r300 -- the > development is now happening in their CVS, until they get things > stabilized. > > This patch should be sent to r300.sf.net folks once you get it working, > assuming they don't already have it in their CVS. > > http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DriTroubleshooting has > instructions on troubleshooting DRI issues. No, that patch is the only change I made. I pulled the PCI ID from the r300 CVS, so they already have it. If the r300 support in our kernel DRM doesn't work then I have accomplished nothing because I was just making the r350 look like an r300. So much for the easy way... >>My question is this: >>Does direct rendering without render acceleration gain me anything? > > Render acceleration is about the 2d Render extension. It's totally > unrelated. Gotcha. I was definitely confusing things. Thanks! -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCeayPUFz01pkdgZURAgfQAJ0cZFM9NF93vHNR46LEJHurJDcgZwCeKtSn qHWpmXsEOGKTIwfiQY7cbAM= =z7YE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4279AC8A.7060208>