From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb 10 13:57:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA13294
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 13:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA13285
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 13:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA04800; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 13:56:24 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199602102156.NAA04800@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 13:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, phk@critter.tfs.com, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <23417.823939098@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 9, 96 11:58:18 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> 
> Loud sigh.
> 
> And I suppose both of you feel that seat belts, and those who wear
> them, are old fuddy-duddy throw-backs to the age of the horse and
> buggy.  "We don't support the idea of seat belts," says Terry Lambert.
> "Furthermore, we've eliminated the steering wheel and break pedal,
> replacing them with an advanced full voice command system.  Sure, it
> often takes a couple of minutes to get it to pay attention to your
> screams of ``AIGH!  STOP!  STOP!!!'' but progress is worth such
> sacrifices."
 no, its the other way around..

YOU are saying:
But some people inthe past LIKED driving with no seat belts..
they HAVE to be optional!
I'm saying, "Seat belts are to be mandatory" but if you didn't like them
I suggest the following methods to achieve the same feel.
Then YOU are saying But I am used to not having to DO THEM UP!
and I'm saying.. "Get used to it"

julian


> 
> :-)
> 
> 					Jordan
>