From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Oct 7 13:03:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778F310C241C for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059E98440D for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42SkFC4RwczDhqd; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:03:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id kEIJ8EOnW8Za; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (host-78-79-50-183.mobileonline.telia.com [78.79.50.183]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42SkFB0p3WzDhFd; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Dependencies_=e2=80=93_drm-kmod=2c_drm-stable-kmod_?= =?UTF-8?Q?and_drm-next-kmod?= To: Graham Perrin , FreeBSD Current References: From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:03:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 13:03:13 -0000 On 10/7/18 7:17 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > According to : >=20 > - for drm-kmod, drm-stable-kmod is the sole runtime dependency. >=20 > Below, I see -next- (not -stable-): >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-kmod > drm-next-kmod > drm-next-kmod > $ >=20 > =E2=80=93 is that contrary to what's at FreshPorts? (Do I misunderstand= something?) >=20 > ---- >=20 > More: >=20 > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-kmod > $ >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-stable-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-stable-kmod > $ >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-next-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod > drm-kmod > drm-kmod > $ >=20 > =E2=80=93 is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-n= ext-kmod and drm-kmod? Hi! The version of drm-*-kmod that's pulled in is dependent on your FreeBSD=20 version. The dependenvy shown on FreshPorts is probably based on the=20 version of FreeBSD FreshPorts is using to parse the ports tree. gpu-firmware-kmod is a dependency of all drm-*-kmod ports, but it's not=20 a direct dependency of drm-kmod. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising