From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 20:42:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31EF16A468 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C0913C457 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lANKgULQ013055; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: (from redmail@localhost) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lANKgUB9013054; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20071123204230.GA13043@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> References: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Lapo Luchini , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:25:25PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect > > ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing > > to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take > > in as deps) > > You can cd some/port/&&make depends, but personally, I've also > always thought that the difference between direct and indirect > dependencies should be embedded in the package system. Haven't been following this thread, so apologies if I misunderstand or repeat. If you want only the direct depends, you can do this (under sh or bash) cd the-port for a in `make -V _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS` do (cd `echo $a | sed -E 's/.*://'` && make -V PKGNAME); done