Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:51:32 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org> Cc: HardenedBSD Core <core@hardenedbsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ASLR work into -HEAD ? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=HAw5%2BcUUTMUtV_WbYDFqqxrreZ0zYgiC%2B9LiotpWCFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPQ4fftmjJ2tfAWzULoTQiY3ZO=GRP9VRt-LtzxUnoMJCZgHLw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmomszKm47aLnGWiouUQHvmB8%2BchA=y-q1zvtOwJ7_iqe0g@mail.gmail.com> <7C64CB2B-3FD0-434C-A11A-2A841537220F@bsdimp.com> <CAJ-Vmo=JZoM0V=sSNtW-2Pdh-8gtXWhAGd7uKV7v_rwECqMQJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQ4fftmjJ2tfAWzULoTQiY3ZO=GRP9VRt-LtzxUnoMJCZgHLw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 March 2015 at 13:31, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org> wr= ote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 19 March 2015 at 12:56, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Apparently this is done but has stalled: >>>> >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D473 >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any strong objections to it landing in the tree as-is= ? >>> >>> There=E2=80=99s rather a lot of them specifically spelled out in the co= de review. >>> >>> Many of the earlier ones were kinda blown off, so I=E2=80=99ve not been= inclined >>> to take the time to re-review it. Glancing at it, I see several minor i= ssues >>> that should be cleaned up. >> >> Cool. Thanks for taking the time to look at it again. >> >> Shawn is in #freebsd on freenode irc, so if you/others want a more >> interactive review then he's there during the day. > > Please CC the core@hardenedbsd.org in future please, when you are > talking about this issue. > > Adrian: do you able to review the MIPS or ARM part especially or test the= m? I'm out of spare cycles to poke at the MIPS stuff, sorry. All I can suggest in the short term is that you fire it up in a mips32 / mips64 emulator environment. FreeBSD works fine in qemu-devel in all four modes (32, 64 bit; big/little endian.) YOu should be able to get high test coverage that way. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=HAw5%2BcUUTMUtV_WbYDFqqxrreZ0zYgiC%2B9LiotpWCFg>