From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 22:13:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BAD44C; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F338FC17; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pakbsde14.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DA81B94A; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:13:13 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r242109 - stable/9/games/fortune/datfiles Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:56:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p22; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201210260034.q9Q0YRmY082297@svn.freebsd.org> <508A99C3.20705@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212101656.04306.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:13:13 -0500 (EST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn , Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:13:14 -0000 On Friday, October 26, 2012 11:23:17 am Eitan Adler wrote: > On 26 October 2012 10:10, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > No. It is staying for the duration of the branch. So this MFC may have been > > premature. > > As I said previously: I MFCed this because it is a low-impact change > and it makes future MFCs easier in the event that the fortune file > changes again. I think it is fine to start training users to not use sysintall, but when doing an MFC like this, you need to refine the message to be relevant to the branch you are merging to if needed. Blindly copying and pasting the original message is nomt always appropriate. -- John Baldwin