From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 15:59:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9AA16A408 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from optimus.centralmiss.com (ns.centralmiss.com [206.156.254.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589813C4C2 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by optimus.centralmiss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B161D287B0; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:59:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 4E3EA61C41; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:59:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:59:18 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Doug Poland Message-ID: <20070313155918.GJ56342@over-yonder.net> References: <58211.69.129.174.18.1173797454.squirrel@email.polands.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58211.69.129.174.18.1173797454.squirrel@email.polands.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14-fullermd.3 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testing UFS/Snapshots/Quotas on -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:59:19 -0000 On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:50:54AM -0500 I heard the voice of Doug Poland, and lo! it spake thus: > > In addition, it appears that compiling support for quotas in the > kernel will force the Giant lock on UFS and I want to make sure I > won't have a performance regression on the filesystem. I can tell you that the impact will range from negligable to significant, depending on the particular workload. I have a RELENG_6 box that, for hysterical raisins, has the ports tree on a partition with quotas, and a large 'portsnap update' gets VERY jerky. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.