From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 18 04:37:48 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC16A64
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:37:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru)
Received: from elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:14c0::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF99375
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.248.32] ([192.168.248.32])
 by elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2I4bf4u088084
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:37:43 +0600 (YEKT)
 (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru)
Message-ID: <51469A13.7090503@norma.perm.ru>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:37:39 +0600
From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: carp regression in 9.1 ?
References: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd>
 <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru>
 <CAPBZQG1_1hQgpmjAMTerQBqdXUK8fnAx=k81GKN0wmZ6KZAt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG1_1hQgpmjAMTerQBqdXUK8fnAx=k81GKN0wmZ6KZAt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (elf.hq.norma.perm.ru [192.168.3.10]); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:37:44 +0600 (YEKT)
X-Spam-Status: No hits=-101.0 bayes=0.5 testhits ALL_TRUSTED=-1,
 USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on elf.hq.norma.perm.ru
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:37:48 -0000

Hi.

On 17.03.2013 21:20, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>
> From this aspects carp in 10(HEAD) should behave the same since the 
> internals of carp have not been changed only the iconnection with the 
> FreeBSD stack has.
> Talking about aliases on carp that used to be a bit broken up-to 9.x 
> they do not exist at all in 10.
> Which needs a bit of discussion per se how to solve.
>
>
Yup, but the same behaviour can be achieved in 10.x with two ways:
- one address == one vhid (when a machine needs to neighbour with carp 
on 8.x this requires configuration changes on 8.x).
- multiple addresses == one vhid, in the same order the addresses appear 
on the neighbor, regardless of the version.

I tried both ways and they both work.
Eugene.