Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:38:48 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl <tmoestl@gmx.net> To: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cut(1) patch Message-ID: <20010127133848.A3876@crow.dom2ip.de> In-Reply-To: <20010127042518.A39246@puck.firepipe.net>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:25:18AM -0500 References: <20010127020528.N2071@puck.firepipe.net> <200101270752.f0R7qKW12971@gratis.grondar.za> <20010127042518.A39246@puck.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:25:18AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > What is
> >
> > + if (fname) {}
> >
> > for??
>
> Best way I could think of to eliminate "fname not used" issued by
> BDECFLAGS. Probably a tad lame though..
Won't
(void)fname;
do? This usually silences these warnings for me, plus I'm relatvely sure
that gcc will not generate any code from it ;-)
- thomas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010127133848.A3876>