Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:49:37 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@FreeBSD.org> To: Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Cc: FreeBSD Gnome <freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: add pstoedit as a dependency to inkscape Message-ID: <4239A711.4020102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050317151658.GB96355@iib.unsam.edu.ar> References: <20050316195646.GL51300@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <20050317151658.GB96355@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fernan Aguero wrote: >+----[ To FreeBSD Gnome <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> (16.Mar.2005 16:56): >| >| All of them disappear by installing pstoedit. The attached >| patch adds pstoedit to RUN_DEPENDS. >| >+----] > >Should I open a PR so that it doesn't get lost ... it's a >tiny and simple patch, though. > > Well. I get it. But this tiny patch brings in big dependecy. I in a doubt that majority of people will be happy to build and install that stuff just for the sake of EPS import. I also can see other extensions like DIA not plugged-in by default. From the other hand if they (pstoedit, dia) installed inkscape should pickup them at run-time. What do you think guys? Thanks, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4239A711.4020102>