From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug 17 20: 8:10 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BED14DC4
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA45658;
	Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:08:33 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA00764; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:08:06 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199908180308.VAA00764@harmony.village.org>
To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Subject: Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org,
	pwd@apple.com, warner.c@apple.com, umeshv@apple.com,
	Wilfredo Sanchez <wsanchez@apple.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:32:31 +0930."
		<XFMail.990818123231.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> 
References: <XFMail.990818123231.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>  
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:08:05 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <XFMail.990818123231.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> "Daniel O'Connor" writes:
: IMHO being abe to override UID:GID's would be useful in a normal
: mount because umapfs adds more complexity to work. (Though I can see
: that doing it in the various FS's would suck royally)

I don't understand the objection...  umapfs is generic and relatively
small....  I don't know if it actually works under FreeBSD-stable or
-current, but it is in the tree.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message