Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:53:23 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>, Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>
Subject:   Re: [long] Network stack -> NIC flow (was Re: MQ Patch.)
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonUiBw%2B_auJEz254Gsyu9yq2awoFKyKDM9S4iY5S8BiOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52717A62.7040600@freebsd.org>
References:  <40948D79-E890-4360-A3F2-BEC34A389C7E@lakerest.net> <526FFED9.1070704@freebsd.org> <CA%2BhQ2%2BgTc87M0f5pvFeW_GCZDogrLkT_1S2bKHngNcDEBUeZYQ@mail.gmail.com> <52701D8B.8050907@freebsd.org> <527022AC.4030502@FreeBSD.org> <527027CE.5040806@freebsd.org> <5270309E.5090403@FreeBSD.org> <5270462B.8050305@freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmo=6thETmTDrPYRjwNTEQaTWkSTKdRYN3eRw5xVhsvr5RQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131030050056.GA84368@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <52717A62.7040600@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 October 2013 14:30, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:

> As default setup and when running a server no QoS will be active
> or inserted.  No or only very small software queues exist to handle
> concurrency (except for ieee80211 to do sophisticated frame management
> inside *if_txframe).  Whenever the DMA ring is full there is no point
> in queuing up more packets.  Instead the socket buffers act as buffers
> and also ensure flow control and backpressure up to userspace to limit
> kernel memory usage from double and triple buffering.

.. and what about for LAN<->WAN traffic, where there's no socket buffers?



-adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonUiBw%2B_auJEz254Gsyu9yq2awoFKyKDM9S4iY5S8BiOA>