From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Nov 9 17:06:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F7EC38BA8 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a02:2770:15:0:21a:4aff:fe1b:d1ad]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247E8FA7 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu (unknown [10.77.0.1]) by mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E4F22C34F8 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:06:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=niklaas.eu; s=default; t=1478711183; bh=lQ9wsQxAXlDJ7Kvy5MbVJtvztXazOf+W69np+OvF7V4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To; b=IYp3UH5JNpX/nKx92gyS1DAqru6OjQpyW3Pl4hkEi4t353Rkm02jFjUjNO7fdpkxF dBbRdveBc0WSK1Y8LlG047yIwWqgIFBdCjNUwSgni4tMGnqX7x5kfi6jDCSpgq+ofv MWWsk8QKpi8t3sfxy40rIlqNVzV8hKHvhtaGoMaU= Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:06:22 +0100 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: After perl upgrade: "Can't locate XML/Parser.pm in @INC" Message-ID: <20161109170622.ssatt5vdemaarrbi@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> Reply-To: stdin@niklaas.eu Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20161109144002.6uu3t6hbdcjafuav@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161003 (1.7.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:06:26 -0000 Matthew Seaman [2016-11-09 15:35 +0000] : > It is possible to use multiple repositories with pkg, but that doesn't > mean you can mix any arbitrary set of repositories. In particular, if > you mix a repository build against a current version of the ports tree > against one of the quarterly packages sets then the fact that you can > end up with different versions of the same package in each repository > does tend to have undesirable effects. >=20 > Multiple repo support works best when both repos are using essentially > the same copy of the ports tree, and you use one to provide and overlay > for certain packages with non-default options settings. If one of your > repositories is the default quarterly package set, then I'd recommend > checking out the appropriate SVN branch for any package sets you build > yourself. OK. Thanks a lot for your thorough explanation! Niklaas