From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Nov 13 18:08:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA04554
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from friley216.res.iastate.edu (friley216.res.iastate.edu [129.186.78.216])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA04431;
          Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from friley216.res.iastate.edu (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by friley216.res.iastate.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA06226; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 20:07:39 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199611140207.UAA06226@friley216.res.iastate.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
cc: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu, dyson@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org,
        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: pbufs (was: Re: ufs is too slow?) 
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:13:18 +0100.
             <22583.847905198@verdi.nethelp.no> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 20:07:38 -0600
From: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley216.res.iastate.edu>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>See	http://ee.lbl.gov/nrg-talks.html

Thanks for the pointer.

>In particular, the 1992 talk "Design Changes to the Kernel Network
>Architecture for 4.4BSD", and the 1993 talk "Some Design Issues for
>High-speed Networks".

I like it.  So who is going to do the implementation then?  :)  I saw it 
mentioned that the new tcp/ip code was intended for inclusion in 4.4, but the 
lawsuit made that impossible.  It's really too bad..

Chris

>Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no