From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Nov 19 12:49:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA25236 for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 12:49:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA25219 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 12:48:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA11942; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA06345; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:49 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:49 -0700 Message-Id: <199711192048.NAA06345@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ari Suutari Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: APM and Compaq Contura 400CX In-Reply-To: References: <199711182043.NAA03016@mt.sri.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Are you running the latest/greatest bits in apm.c (v1.65)? > > Yep, 1.65 it is. > > > If so, how long of a delay are you using? > > This was just an experiment. The delay is 1 second, which > is quite long I guess. I could try to iterate what is > the minimum. (I am also willing to test other solutions > to this if needed.) See previous email on this subject. FreeBSD doesn't (yet) support 'standby' mode, so we assume all modes are suspend modes. This is not good, so for now I think your timeout is probably adequate until standby mode is implemented. ;( Nate