From owner-freebsd-gnome Mon Mar 4 21: 6:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E637B416; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:06:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident) by omega.lovett.com with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16i79S-000Hnu-00; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 21:06:14 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 23:06:23 -0600 Subject: Re: Distfile move megapatch From: Ade Lovett To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3C833B43.322DD72B@FreeBSD.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 03/04/02 03:15, "Maxim Sobolev" wrote: > Honestly I don't like it, for the reasons already discussed here. As I > said earlier we don't really need to distract our users with slow > Internet connections by the need to re-download the whole set of > distfiles. Therefore, my vote is a "strong no". Well, at the moment there are some 80+ ports affected, and the GNOME 1.x updates are definitely slowing down. It's trivial for me to keep the patchset up to date as and when ports are upgraded, but at some point, we'll have to pull the trigger. As to whether that's just before 5.0-DP1, or just before 4.6-REL is the question. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message