From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 21:50:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85971C69 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504CB8E5 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 16so18570531iea.40 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:50:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DQkQKAB8dla4sO/JlbE6u+P3AFTf8xdbrs6bUo9ukB4=; b=KVDhCLHzRq+iXGrgGs+VX7MOteAZlT5Wp6BqLLfBOQoghKSvx2FrKQRGXpaAQTsbz2 GUjGv+ZAa8ILqmNJaxtuxBOtlPQctOzGWV0X7fZ+T/sNfazvsouEqKtfIlbA4rj2h7Ob eR+JX+4+gKbYyWG6jmANGvJ7atVJSxLbTaQ1ai8gIxXzknPP/FpcVL2t66R8Ab3l2ucc naLq5B+n+Cyp4dO3fYqXtbC1/7gJMGj8IRndrBU4Oc3efrP+S2YoGbH82ZAr6a+CwKFc 26womhg2oD0V9p/aBehLd1sKc0qOtbbx2YRDHZ2k2UaGetlIoCCgQuici1TrZmE2UH/J w/bA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.222.201 with SMTP id qo9mr38633186igc.111.1357249846417; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:50:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.88.137 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:50:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:50:46 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? From: "b.f." To: "Patrick M. Hausen" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:50:47 -0000 >Hello, > >Am 03.01.2013 um 16:36 schrieb Eitan Adler : >> CVS/SVN should be considered a development tool. Users should not see >> the impact of the switch. In theory. > > >What is the recommended csup replacement for users that did > > cd /usr/src && make update buildworld buildkernel > >as their method of keeping the system current? > >I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs source >updates. Are there more lightweight ways? subversion isn't so bad, especially if you build a stripped-down version -- many of the optional dependencies aren't needed for a basic client, which is a fraction of the size of the source code. Just get rid of the extras, and use a stripped-down version of sqlite3 only. And of course you could install it on one of your machines, and then distribute the source code among the rest by other means. But there are alternatives, and several are documented in the FreeBSD Handbook(does anyone read it?): --you could use ports/net/rsync or an rsync clone, which may be smaller (See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors-rsync.html ); or --you could use ctm(1) to get the repository via email, or use fetch(1) or another small ftp/http client to grab the ctm deltas directly from the server at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CTM/ , or from one of the mirrors (See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ctm.html ). Regards, b.