From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 17:13:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F94C16A417 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBBE013C448 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 6179 invoked by uid 1006); 17 Dec 2007 17:13:17 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(-1.4/100.0):. Processed in 1.357392 secs); 17 Dec 2007 17:13:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.15) by -v with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 17:13:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24779 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2007 17:13:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 17:13:15 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:13:15 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51745.65.117.48.155.1197911596.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:13:15 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:13:19 -0000 Ladies and Gentlemen, I want to check the understanding of jails. My understanding is a jail uses the existing kernel configuration and cannot use its own kernel configuration. Is this correct? Thanks, Jay