From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 09:25:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5B9281065675; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:25:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20110120092507.GA82095@FreeBSD.org> References: <201101180845.p0I8jubc025995@repoman.freebsd.org> <70181583@serv3.int.kfs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70181583@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Wen Heping , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/moinmoin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:25:07 -0000 On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:32:16PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Wen Heping writes: > > > wen 2011-01-18 08:45:56 UTC > > > > - Add license > ----- > > +LICENSE= GPLv2 > > +LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/docs/licenses/COPYING > ----- > > This is a general question, just picking this commit up. > Should we provide the license text if it's a standard one? > My vote is "no"... I would also said no. In fact, I find it abusive and wrong to use the LICENSE_FILE at all for standard licenses. Then problem is that people don't care, and we (ports people) do not do enough to educate them, and even sometimes encourage mistakes by committing bad submissions. ./danfe