From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 11 14:53:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1EBB116A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 24D2143D1D; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:53:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa21539@salmon>; 11 Mar 2004 22:53:48 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:53:47 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Message-ID: <20040311225347.GA66644@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20040310192255.GD14892@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
	<20040310193840.6479F77A6D4@guns.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040310193840.6479F77A6D4@guns.icir.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:53:50 -0000

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:38:40PM -0500, Mark Allman wrote:
> > I looked for the paper I paraphrased, I'm pretty sure if was one by
> > Sally Floyd.
> 
> I don't have the paper reference handy, but it's Sally's HighSpeed TCP
> work.  I do happen to have a blurb on it sitting here that I think
> captures it well...  Think of a network with an RTT of 100ms, a 1500

Mind you, Petri originally asked about evidence for two machines
back-to-back, and 100ms is rather long for that (unless you're at
Steven Low's lab ;-)

	David.