From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 29 17:52:59 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426B522B
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D544CD3
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ta17so3922425obb.36
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=zQTLdRh44p5ZyU12X+BDkzzmmobQ9lRJZtJT+PLWZAo=;
 b=XljMkW/y6Xa8PfCr/9xJyq9bNVf0GM8t3KtT58LeGDUB7W8jjaHsyUtpITRXdEgvwv
 shMrMT358UTyF4oBUBeFGS4NY8HbZrQEOGkJ07xXVZ3l4/hX0cFju8qX0QAonZl8wPW/
 7GMylYPxoUWC0ALiNdkkPxpFJIYaFoosMSRPbWmvDev8qL0mFKYmbBIPFyKcULAiMpxY
 GrkyTRz9T7JzQHkNEiumF8Q3Dwu/VvCXlt/3PjsnlesUIksyqdl5dH2VhJkPN0BAGnww
 NezA5uOiDLe78K3eFTTvd8JVEue+4Ac4PaUQyKJIba9745/trZtkXct4NzQPN4B2t51u
 GtVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.129.230 with SMTP id nz6mr2307729obb.49.1369849978633;
 Wed, 29 May 2013 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.56.198 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK3QwWJR5F1=1p=hQHvSDXcV_vXkX5W=pbmoQGVrZu3-dA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1369558712.96152.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <20130526160906.4e379016@X220.ovitrap.com>
 <20130526113235.f5dbe768.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305261724050.29348@wonkity.com>
 <CA+tpaK106Fu0dKmR-4_e3ZjnjoMb3ZrjWEscXX99v1qj4BzCJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305261813040.30008@wonkity.com>
 <CA+tpaK3QwWJR5F1=1p=hQHvSDXcV_vXkX5W=pbmoQGVrZu3-dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:52:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu1Y72PxQ_Jtw_8RFuph1X60exkEwKvh2WkZtL0Xt0AkOFQzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "swap" partition leads to instability?
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlPGCDPxDIcLqPYqH58+x4XgIYV6rBxXCqL7V4DVgi8fExzk7Q7igvr6Hr+5+NGnqXvsqK
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 May 2013 18:05:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>,
 Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>,
 "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
 "M. V." <bored_to_death85@yahoo.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:59 -0000

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>wrote:


>
> Normal dynamic wear leveling on a modern SSD will be better than
> imposing an FS- backed swap for 4GB partion occupying a small fraction
> of total drive space.
>
>
Quite so.

- M