From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 07:27:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAD61065677; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C488FC12; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5496E.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.73.110]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8252E05C; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAA7A8137; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1209022032; bh=+zA8ni2kUXJ0MQE4R04zLjIuIisoi9YV7 vz6iR0swfY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=H/UelapvntNCoQZltyheCaf48eLf+YPh/00Af9bbvhfn22dJKSc2oEi/ozExhGEQW jb7k1zXoR42UO+aCAyGeFij5zwExAoSunPQsbzoD1/7g3tj3R4b0kMA1mVZ3Toun6e3 jQ7smH08Fc+6UIJG4B1nWjEukt+Nvz49PUxBQfLRqF5Sr5oxtFXKwqMZhTwjdNDWHRl t2O5o2ibaDB23KiGG+z/HL9FaFYbM2i/9309YiC9n1NpHXuo6AnVX/TCnNXmElNhN9p jsyOKM9IajBC9gDm6QJW5/t7ejv4SkKsnXcDHGrCxMBPNBp9yvcE2PctqgMj0/jTAvK p2VtyMzmQ== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m3O7RB6j083287; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20080424092711.10703q81vign1hkw@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:11 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Andriy Gapon References: <480E3F5E.3060501@icyb.net.ua> <1208903822.1548.62.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <480F3B39.3090702@icyb.net.ua> <1208957957.58820.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080424080229.114632lxyo7mbi4g@webmail.leidinger.net> <48102CCE.6020004@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <48102CCE.6020004@icyb.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.2-RC2) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-13.404, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, J_CHICKENPOX_12 0.60, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 1.40, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10, SMILEY -0.50) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: purely package-based/oriented solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:27:20 -0000 Quoting Andriy Gapon (from Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:46:38 +0300= ): > on 24/04/2008 09:02 Alexander Leidinger said the following: >> Quoting Pav Lucistnik (from Wed, 23 Apr 2008 >> 15:39:17 +0200): >> >>> Andriy Gapon p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v st 23. 04. 2008 v 16:35 +0300: >> >>>> BTW, strange thing: >>>> $ portupgrade -a -PP >>>> ... >>>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/linux_kdump: >>>> does not build with the default linux base, use the =20 >>>> package instead >>>> >>>> What's this about? :-) I do say to use packages only. >>> Guess portupgrade still looks at the ports tree. What happens if you try >>> to rm -rf /usr/ports first? >> >> If someone knows a better way of handling this (using something else >> than IGNORE, with the same effect to people trying to build it from >> ports but with a better behavior when used with portupgrade -PP), I'am >> all ears (a better way of fixing this would be to include preparsed >> linux stuff, but there are more important things on my TODO list...). > > Alexander, > > I am not completely sure what your question was. portupgrade moans because linux_kdump contains IGNORE. If someone =20 knows something with a similar behavior as above which could =20 replace/extend IGNORE, portupgrade may behave better. > My concern is: why on -PP mode portupgrade needs ports at all? Why not > just go to package repository and check what you've got there. You could do a feature request which would switch portupgrade to this =20 behavior if a special command line switch is given (maybe -PPP). > I do not demand that portupgrade be tailored to my needs, I am just > saying that it doesn't meet them. And there's nothing written in stone that it can not be changed to =20 suit your needs too... Bye, Alexander. --=20 When I demanded of my friend what viands he preferred, He quoth: "A large cold bottle, and a small hot bird!" =09=09-- Eugene Field, "The Bottle and the Bird" http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137