Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: olsenc@smokey.ee.washington.edu (Clint Olsen) Cc: hardware@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI_DELAY Message-ID: <199510120911.CAA04673@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199510120749.AAA00197@smokey.ee.washington.edu> from "Clint Olsen" at Oct 12, 95 00:49:25 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It was suggested that I increase SCSI_DELAY. As I suspected, it > didn't have any effect. I changed it from 10 to 20 seconds. I > doubt an eon would have any difference: > > aic0 at 0x340-0x35f irq 11 on isa > aic0 waiting for scsi devices to settle > (aic0:1:0): "CDC 94171-9 0045" type 0 fixed SCSI 1 > sd0(aic0:1:0): Direct-Access 312MB (640584 512 byte sectors) > (aic0:2:0): "unknown unknown ????" type 0 fixed SCSI 0 Well it's seeing the device.. but the resulting data isn't standard... so it doesn't know the type is this a REALLY OLD device? (like maybe SASI not even SCSI?) can you show that identify data again? I'll look at it better next time.. i promise.. > > However, using scsi(8) commands does properly identify the second > disk. Could the aic driver be at fault? > > Thanks, > > -Clint >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510120911.CAA04673>