Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:59:07 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: latest freebsd:11:x86:64 repo and ruby 1.9 -> 2.0 Message-ID: <585E484A9CF38009CE986770@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org> References: <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org> <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+--On 20 octobre 2014 09:29:23 +0300 Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote: | On 20/10/2014 01:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: |> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: |>>> $ pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD |>>> repository is up-to-date. Updating poudriere repository catalogue... |>>> poudriere repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. |>>> Checking for upgrades (24 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done |>>> (1 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The |>>> following 24 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): |>> |>> First, a minor nit: of 0 checked? |>> |>>> Installed packages to be REMOVED: ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1 porttools-1.02 |>>> newfile-1.0.14_4 hub-1.12.2 libchk-1.10.3 zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2 |>> |>> Then the real problem, I do not want these packages to be removed except |>> for ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1. In other words, I want to keep using |>> zfs-snapshot-mgmt, libchk, hub and porttools. What should I do? |> |> Just accept the upgrade and reinstall them they are there. we need to |> improve the solver to prevent that. | | OK. This should work for me this time, but in general we can see how | annoying this could be if dozens of packages would be affected. Just wait for the default Perl change from 5.16 to 5.18, it's going to be orders of magnitude worse... -- Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?585E484A9CF38009CE986770>