Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:14:36 +0200
From:      Joan Picanyol i Puig <lists-freebsd-hackers@biaix.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Configuration differences for jails
Message-ID:  <20050421151436.GA86490@grummit.biaix.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050420165559.GI91329@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
References:  <BAY2-F389017D4F55242220F49FFF22B0@phx.gbl> <20050420135013.GE91329@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050420143715.GF91329@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050420151104.GA11753@grummit.biaix.org> <20050420165559.GI91329@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> [20050420 18:55]:

[snip much appreciated example]

> > I don't think it's easy to take /etc/ outside the root fs, but I don't
> > see how to share /bin or /lib without leaking info.
> >
> > How do you handle this?
> 
> As I said above, null mount each directory.

Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for. I hadn't read close
enough to appreciate the difference betwen unionfs and nullfs until now.

> > What are those distribution targets and how can
> > I use them?

I've seen them mentioned again in this thread. There apparently is a
"make distribution" target designed to address /etc, but I can't find it
anywhere.

qvb
-- 
pica



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050421151436.GA86490>