From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 19:00:25 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5017B106567C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:00:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0937E8FC18
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:00:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=juXJEktbvzTqRWh8vqcJIPZwLZplxZCwgZS/J5yxm78=; 
	b=SrxzTAsmg/d8gQm+eZZbapGNaM8La9bsx73OM4XaBMgVO2v7KTQkZc/3lG4F5nTeEUauje0VhkwNaEL7oAY1vMAywJLNuXFoiDhM0KwJlC8kU2QjTAa3TC8m4QZvtODX;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>) id 1Sjazv-0000Dp-Bu
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:00:24 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1340737217-94480-94479/5/61; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:00:17
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com>
	<20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu>
	<4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<4FE97008.2060501@netfence.it>
	<4FE97AE1.9080109@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it>
	<op.wgilfxbv34t2sn@tech304> <20120626184253.GA2540@medusa.sysfault.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:00:16 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wgixqqbz34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <20120626184253.GA2540@medusa.sysfault.org>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Subject: Re: Port system "problems"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:00:25 -0000

On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:42:54 -0500, Marcus von Appen <mva@freebsd.org>  
wrote:
>
> That said, I might assume that the sqlite solution is faster, but noone
> can see that yet.
>

The new system will be much, much better overall and people just need to  
stop making conclusions without knowing all the facts. It's going to be a  
heavily revamped system so people should stop comparing it to our current  
architecture. It's only similar on the surface.