From owner-freebsd-transport@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 10:25:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-transport@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212ED15101B6 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:25:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19B184CAA for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (p57BB40DA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.187.64.218]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F172721E281E; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:25:27 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: DSACK From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:25:26 +0100 Cc: "freebsd-transport@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5ACAD39A-2A77-43BB-BE93-994C1C6C93AB@freebsd.org> References: To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-transport@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions of transport level network protocols in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:25:32 -0000 > On 23. Feb 2019, at 10:29, Scheffenegger, Richard = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > A colleague pointed me to the stack (HEAD) no longer emitting DSACK = options a few days ago... >=20 > I was under the impression, that older versions of FreeBSD would send = out DSACKs for spurious duplicate packets. >=20 > But when I try this script against HEAD, regular cumulative ACKs = without DSACK blocks are showing up. >=20 > Currently bandwidth starved - but was that a conscious decision? Or = was me observing DSACKs never a thing? I would say if it is working in stable/11, but not in stable/12 and = head, it is a regression. Best regards Michael >=20 > Thanks a lot, > Richard >=20