From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 04:58:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A2F106566C; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Received: from mail.wanderview.com (mail.wanderview.com [66.92.166.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972BC8FC0C; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xykon.in.wanderview.com (xykon.in.wanderview.com [10.76.10.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.wanderview.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB14wu4t011918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:58:56 GMT (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ben Kelly In-Reply-To: <20091130234537.GA78185@lath.rinet.ru> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:58:55 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4B129960.9030107@gmail.com> <4B12B6B9.3030106@bsd.com.br> <4B12C32F.3060709@gmail.com> <4B12C543.2070204@mgwigglesworth.net> <4B141A77.4030102@gmail.com> <20091130201222.GC72710@lath.rinet.ru> <20091130234537.GA78185@lath.rinet.ru> To: Oleg Bulyzhin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.76.20.1 Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Kevin Smith , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:58:58 -0000 On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:38:50PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote: >>=20 >> I've also run into the problem recently on 9-CURRENT (last synced on = 11/13/2009). My configuration looks like: >>=20 >=20 > My quick attempt to reproduce the issue failed. Perhaps i'm missing = something. >=20 > How are you measuring connection bandwidth?=20 I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet. I have = simply observed these messages repeating in my log: dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle! Under normal conditions I don't really need the dummynet rules to shape = traffic for my configuration to work, so it has not been a high priority = for me yet. Do you see the log messages? Thanks. - Ben=