From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 2 14:31:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D101065673; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BD28FC18; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BA7CB979; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:31:50 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Sean Bruno Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:49:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <1333039719.3948.3.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <201203301714.37323.jhb@freebsd.org> <1333143034.4450.1.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1333143034.4450.1.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204020849.58087.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:31:50 -0400 (EDT) Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:31:50 -0000 On Friday, March 30, 2012 5:30:34 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > This is the relevant bits: > > > > Handle 0x2600, DMI type 38, 18 bytes > > IPMI Device Information > > Interface Type: KCS (Keyboard Control Style) > > Specification Version: 2.0 > > I2C Slave Address: 0x10 > > NV Storage Device: Not Present > > Base Address: 0x0000000000000CA8 (I/O) > > Register Spacing: 32-bit Boundaries > > > > Note the '32-bit' boundaries. I think ACPI doesn't support that for its > > attachment (well, it does if they specify each port as a separate thing in > > _CRS). Can you get acpidump -d output? > > > > Aye, here ya go. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/acpidump_r815.txt Hmm, that actually looks correct. Try sabotaging the ACPI attach just for testing (i.e. add a 'return (ENXIO)' to the top of the probe routine in ipmi_acpi.c) just to see if that makes a difference. If not, then I think the BMC is just broken or your BIOS is lying. -- John Baldwin